NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23411 vs 18198
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 879
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137664 vs 98281
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 342.287 vs 293.508
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 vs 29.145
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 vs 1438.826
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 25232
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 3359
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 25232
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 3359
- 496.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3478 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 vs 18198 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 879 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 vs 98281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 vs 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 vs 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 vs 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 vs 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 vs 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1575 MHz
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 290 Watt
- 11.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 146.214
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1575 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 290 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 vs 146.214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 | 18198 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 879 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 | 98281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 | 7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 | 2 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 66 | 129 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 13.6 B |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 650 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 2-Slot |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |