NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 290 Watt vs 320 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 3356
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s
- Around 42% higher pipelines: 8704 vs 6144
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25146 vs 23411
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 vs 137664
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 342.287
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 42.369
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 146.214
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1807.647
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 31420
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 31420
- Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4420 vs 3478
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 6144 |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 vs 23411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 1051 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 vs 137664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1807.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 31420 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 vs 3478 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 | 25146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 1053 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 | 167014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 | 4420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA104 | GA102 |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 66 | 56 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 320 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |