NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 290 Watt versus 320 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 versus 1041
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 versus 3716
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 versus 3356
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 versus 3716
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 versus 3356
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt versus 320 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 versus 1041 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 465.1 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s
- Environ 42% de pipelines plus haut: 8704 versus 6144
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 10 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25305 versus 23668
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 167693 versus 138698
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 versus 342.287
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 versus 42.369
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 146.214
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 versus 1807.647
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 versus 31420
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 versus 31420
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17708 versus 14960
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.1 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8704 versus 6144 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 10 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25305 versus 23668 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167693 versus 138698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 versus 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 versus 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 versus 1807.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 versus 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 versus 31420 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17708 versus 14960 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23668 | 25305 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 1041 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138698 | 167693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14960 | 17708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA102 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 56 | 52 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 339.8 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 320 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | 700 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 608.3 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |