NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 9% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1575 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Etwa 4% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Etwa 10% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 290 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 1041
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 3716
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 3356
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 3716
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 3356
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 290 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 1041 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 vs 3356 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Etwa 37% höhere Texturfüllrate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s
- Etwa 42% höhere Leitungssysteme: 8704 vs 6144
- Um etwa 25% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25317 vs 23672
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167693 vs 138726
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 342.287
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 42.369
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 146.214
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1807.647
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 31420
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 31420
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17706 vs 14958
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 8704 vs 6144 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25317 vs 23672 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167693 vs 138726 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1807.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 31420 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17706 vs 14958 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23672 | 25317 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 1041 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138726 | 167693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14958 | 17706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $599 | $699 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 56 | 52 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 290 Watt | 320 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | 700 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 608.3 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |