NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
vs
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Around 48% higher pipelines: 8704 vs 5888
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 24538 vs 21935
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1004 vs 967
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 181072 vs 135018
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 610.23 vs 456.197
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6745.122 vs 5782.666
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 55.839 vs 40.757
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 217.054 vs 201.439
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2179.577 vs 1634.218
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 31716
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 31716
- Around 29% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17699 vs 13722
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 8704 vs 5888 |
| Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 24538 vs 21935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1004 vs 967 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 181072 vs 135018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 610.23 vs 456.197 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6745.122 vs 5782.666 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 55.839 vs 40.757 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 217.054 vs 201.439 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2179.577 vs 1634.218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 31716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 31716 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17699 vs 13722 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective)
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3716
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3356
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3716
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 320 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 24538 | 21935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1004 | 967 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 181072 | 135018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 610.23 | 456.197 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6745.122 | 5782.666 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 55.839 | 40.757 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 217.054 | 201.439 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2179.577 | 1634.218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 31716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 13566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 31930 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 31716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 13566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 31930 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17699 | 13722 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA102 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $499 |
| Place in performance rating | 9 | 6 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 8704 | 5888 |
| Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 285 mm (11.2 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 760.3 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
