NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Etwa 47% höhere Texturfüllrate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Etwa 48% höhere Leitungssysteme: 8704 vs 5888
- Um etwa 25% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25317 vs 22409
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1041 vs 999
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167693 vs 124865
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 452.561
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 5803.174
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 40.794
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1634.218
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 31716
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 31716
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17706 vs 13611
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 8704 vs 5888 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25317 vs 22409 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 vs 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167693 vs 124865 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 452.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1634.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 31716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17706 vs 13611 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Etwa 4% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1500 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Etwa 1% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Etwa 45% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 220 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Etwa 47% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 184.548 vs 175.219
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3716
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3356
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3716
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3356
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 184.548 vs 175.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3356 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25317 | 22409 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167693 | 124865 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 452.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 184.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 1634.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17706 | 13611 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $699 | $499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 52 | 41 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1710 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 8704 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 465.1 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 320 Watt | 220 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 700 Watt | 550 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 760.3 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 320 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |