NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Tesla T4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1515 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 10616
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 592
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 61276
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 127.622
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 3026.812
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 18.798
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 119.936
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 910.721
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 14076
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 1976
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1781
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 14076
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 1976
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1781

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4

• 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 8.2x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26668 10616
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1060 592
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	191142 61276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	690.619 127.622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7585.258 3026.812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.614 18.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	209.424 119.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.384 910.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 1781
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 1781

Compare specifications (specs)