NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 5888
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 983 vs 960
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25647 vs 21728
- Around 45% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19930 vs 13748
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205434 vs 134555
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 5888 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 983 vs 960 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25647 vs 21728 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19930 vs 13748 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 205434 vs 134555 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 983 | 960 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25647 | 21728 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19930 | 13748 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 205434 | 134555 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5765.5 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.109 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 187.041 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1397.885 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18216 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 55849 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18216 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 55849 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA102 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $499 |
| Place in performance rating | 1 | 4 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10496 | 5888 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIATITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
