NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
• Around 78% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 5888
• 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 22408
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 999
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 124865
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 452.561
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 5803.174
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 40.794
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 184.548
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1634.218
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 31716
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 31716
• Around 46% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 vs 13611

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3713
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3354
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3713
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26815 22408
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1051 999
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	188320 124865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	732.196 452.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7585.258 5803.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63.011 40.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.569 184.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.384 1634.218
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 31930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 31930
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	19877 13611

Compare specifications (specs)