NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
• Around 78% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 5888
• 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25781 vs 21816
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 985 vs 965
• Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205239 vs 135018
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 455.06
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 5792.308
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 64.782 vs 40.794
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 259.237 vs 216.709
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2413.674 vs 1619.54
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 32990 vs 30988
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 32990 vs 30988
• Around 46% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19970 vs 13722

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6191 vs 3713
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5592 vs 3354
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6191 vs 3713
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5592 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	25781 21816
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	985 965
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	205239 135018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	732.196 455.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7585.258 5792.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.782 40.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	259.237 216.709
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2413.674 1619.54
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32990 30988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 6191
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 5592
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32990 30988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 6191
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 5592
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	19970 13722

Compare specifications (specs)