NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 85% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 7424
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 743
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26733 vs 23017
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191412 vs 146869
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 7424 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 vs 743 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26733 vs 23017 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191412 vs 146869 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 743 | 1050 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23017 | 26733 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 146869 | 191412 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD104 | GA102 |
Place in performance rating | 41 | 44 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 7424 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 28300 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |