NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 2535 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 165 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 85% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1068 vs 1060
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 May 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1068 vs 1060 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 344.8 GTexel/s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 10496 vs 4352
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 22758
- Around 76% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 vs 2907
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 344.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 4352 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 vs 22758 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 vs 2907 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1068 | 1060 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22758 | 26668 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2907 | 5118 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD106 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 18 May 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 48 | 46 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 4352 | 10496 |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.7 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 344.8 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 22900 million | 28300 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 240 mm, 9.4 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | Triple-slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation
