NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2535 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 344.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 165 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1063 vs 997
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22728 vs 22294
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 May 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 344.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1063 vs 997 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22728 vs 22294 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 35% higher pipelines: 5888 vs 4352
- Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3161 vs 2904
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 5888 vs 4352 |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3161 vs 2904 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1063 | 997 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22728 | 22294 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2904 | 3161 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD106 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 18 May 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 44 | 43 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 4352 | 5888 |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.7 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 344.8 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Transistor count | 22900 million | 17400 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 240 mm, 9.4 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
