NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1980 MHz vs 1605 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 2475 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- 2.8x more pipelines: 7168 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1180 vs 879
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 29969 vs 18198
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 192400 vs 98281
- 661x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4627 vs 7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 vs 2 July 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1980 MHz vs 1605 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2475 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
| Pipelines | 7168 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1180 vs 879 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 29969 vs 18198 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 192400 vs 98281 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4627 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 10.7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1180 | 879 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 29969 | 18198 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 192400 | 98281 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4627 | 7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | 2 July 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 23 | 129 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2475 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1980 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 7168 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 198.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 554.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 13.6 B |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 650 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 2-Slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs
NVIDIATITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 80 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 7800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070
