NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 2340 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 2394 MHz
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 8448 vs 5376
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 285 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1200 vs 1187
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31704 vs 28855
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 224056 vs 169540
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 vs 3 Nov 2022 |
Core clock speed | 2340 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 2394 MHz |
Pipelines | 8448 vs 5376 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1200 vs 1187 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31704 vs 28855 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 224056 vs 169540 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 804.4 GTexel/s vs 689.0 GTexel/s
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 20 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
- Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 26753 vs 24294
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 343.519 vs 255.02
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 804.4 GTexel/s vs 689.0 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 20 GB vs 16 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 26753 vs 24294 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 343.519 vs 255.02 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1200 | 1187 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31704 | 28855 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 224056 | 169540 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 24294 | 26753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.02 | 343.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12483.531 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2714.187 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
Code name | AD103 | Navi 31 |
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | 3 Nov 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 18 | 19 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 2394 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2340 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
Pipelines | 8448 | 5376 |
Pixel fill rate | 250.6 GPixel/s | 459.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 689.0 GTexel/s | 804.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 45900 million | 57700 million |
Compute units | 84 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.218 TFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 51.48 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | 51 mm, 2 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 310 mm, 12.2 inches | 276 mm, 10.9 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | 135 mm, 5.3 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 20 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 672.3 GB/s | 800.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |