NVIDIA ION vs Intel GMA 3150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA ION and Intel GMA 3150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA ION
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 400 MHz
Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 9 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA 3150
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 20 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA ION
GPU 2: Intel GMA 3150
Name | NVIDIA ION | Intel GMA 3150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 108 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 16 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2440 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 571 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 571 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA ION | Intel GMA 3150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Generation 4.0 |
Code name | MCP7A-ION | Pineview |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1692 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 13 Watt |
Transistor count | 282 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCI | PCI |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |