NVIDIA A10 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A10 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A10
- 327.4x more texture fill rate: 488.2 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 800 Watt
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1563 MHz, 12.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective
Texture fill rate | 488.2 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 800 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1563 MHz, 12.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 2355 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2625 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 97% higher pipelines: 18176 vs 9216
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 24 GB
Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2355 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2625 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Pipelines | 18176 vs 9216 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 24 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A10
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
Name | NVIDIA A10 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1007 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22064 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 158308 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA A10 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | GA102 | AD102 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 28 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2625 MHz |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 2355 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 976.3 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1,491 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 31.24 TFLOPS (1:1) | 95.42 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 31.24 TFLOPS | 95.42 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 9216 | 18176 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 504.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 488.2 GTexel/s | 1,491 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 800 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 76300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | Triple-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 336 mm, 13.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 1200 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 16-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 140 mm, 5.5 inches |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 48 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s | 1,152 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1563 MHz, 12.5 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |