NVIDIA A10 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A10 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

NVIDIA A10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A10

327.4x more texture fill rate: 488.2 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s
5.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 800 Watt
Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1563 MHz, 12.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective

Texture fill rate	488.2 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 800 Watt
Memory clock speed	1563 MHz, 12.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2.7x more core clock speed: 2355 MHz vs 885 MHz
Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2625 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Around 97% higher pipelines: 18176 vs 9216
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 24 GB

Launch date	2023 vs 12 Apr 2021
Core clock speed	2355 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed	2625 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Pipelines	18176 vs 9216
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 8 nm
Maximum memory size	48 GB vs 24 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA A10
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Name	NVIDIA A10	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	1007
PassMark - G3D Mark	22064
Geekbench - OpenCL	158308

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA A10	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Code name	GA102	AD102
Launch date	12 Apr 2021	2023
Place in performance rating	28	not rated
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	2625 MHz
Core clock speed	885 MHz	2355 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	4 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	976.3 GFLOPS (1:32)	1,491 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	31.24 TFLOPS (1:1)	95.42 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	31.24 TFLOPS	95.42 TFLOPS
Pipelines	9216	18176
Pixel fill rate	162.7 GPixel/s	504.0 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	488.2 GTexel/s	1,491 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	800 Watt
Transistor count	28300 million	76300 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Single-slot	Triple-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm, 10.5 inches	336 mm, 13.2 inches
Recommended system power (PSU)	450 Watt	1200 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 16-pin
Width	112 mm, 4.4 inches	140 mm, 5.5 inches
Height		61 mm, 2.4 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	48 GB
Memory bandwidth	600.2 GB/s	1,152 GB/s
Memory bus width	384 bit	384 bit
Memory clock speed	1563 MHz, 12.5 Gbps effective	1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X