NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 14119
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 71402
- Around 44% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1788 vs 1242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 7 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1920 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 vs 14119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 vs 71402 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 630
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 vs 630 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 746 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 | 14119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 | 71402 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 | 1242 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD107 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 7 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 167 | 161 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon 760M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
IntelArc A530M
