NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 78% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 211.2 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
| Launch date | 2023 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD106 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 267 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | 47.52 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
