NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 91% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
| Launch date | 2023 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 220.8 GTexel/s vs 211.2 GTexel/s
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s vs 211.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8281 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD106 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 79 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 220.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.13 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | 7.066 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | 88.32 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | 220.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
