NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB GA107
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB GA107 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1552 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1777 MHz
- Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 211.2 GTexel/s vs 142.2 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Launch date | 2023 vs 16 Dec 2022 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1552 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1777 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s vs 142.2 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB GA107
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB GA107 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD106 | GA107 |
Launch date | 2023 | 16 Dec 2022 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1777 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1552 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 142.2 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | 9.098 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | 56.86 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | 142.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 115 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 300 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |