NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 181.4 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 732 vs 403
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17566 vs 6831
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89106 vs 50663
- 5.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2255 vs 421
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 vs 403 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 vs 6831 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 vs 50663 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 vs 421 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 | 403 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 | 6831 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 | 50663 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 | 421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD107 | GA107 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 123 | 248 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1057 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 712 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS | 4.329 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 60.48 GPixel/s | 42.28 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | 67.65 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 75 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |