NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 736 vs 650
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17734 vs 15500
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 736 vs 650 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17734 vs 15500 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 206.4 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89617 vs 88666
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 206.4 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89617 vs 88666 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10431 vs 10426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 736 | 650 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17734 | 15500 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88666 | 89617 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10426 | 10431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD107 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 85 | 80 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 60.48 GPixel/s | 103.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | 206.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
IntelArc A750
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation
