NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 2321 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 2581 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 vs 100473
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 946
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 3 Mar 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 2321 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 2581 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 vs 100473 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 vs 946 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 19722
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2435 vs 2302
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.422 vs 311.253
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 169.697
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 1500.926
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 6622.553
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 vs 19722 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 vs 2302 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 vs 311.253 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 vs 33.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 169.697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 vs 1500.926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 6622.553 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 100473 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 946 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 19824 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | 2435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | 349.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | 34.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | 197.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | 1699.337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | 7129.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD106 | Navi 22 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 3 Mar 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 75 | 51 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
IntelArc A750
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
