NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Around 90% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 4741.1x more texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 321.4x more memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 vs 20732
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 650
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 vs 6332
- 7.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2302 vs 305
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 311.253 vs 75.758
- 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 33.932 vs 5.071
- 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 169.697 vs 24.676
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 vs 301.168
- 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6622.553 vs 843.503
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 25 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 vs 20732 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 vs 650 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 vs 6332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 vs 305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 vs 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 vs 301.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 vs 843.503 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 20732 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 650 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 6332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | 305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | 301.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | 843.503 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
Code name | AD106 | GP107 |
Launch date | 2023 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 75 | 487 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 75 Watt |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |