NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 vs 39165
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 564
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 vs 7881
- 7.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2302 vs 305
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 311.253 vs 134.765
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 33.932 vs 8.799
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 169.697 vs 94.915
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 vs 573.418
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6622.553 vs 1316.075
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 30 April 2019 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 vs 39165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 vs 564 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 vs 7881 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 vs 305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 vs 134.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 vs 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 vs 94.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 vs 573.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 vs 1316.075 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 39165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 564 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 7881 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | 305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | 134.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | 94.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | 573.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | 1316.075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
Code name | AD106 | TU107 |
Launch date | 2023 | 30 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 75 | 376 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | |
Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |