NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA Quadro P600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1557 MHz
- 9072.2x more texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 3840 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 9.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 vs 11181
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 542
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 vs 3327
- 8.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 311.253 vs 35.134
- 10.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 vs 141.164
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1557 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 vs 11181 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 vs 542 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 vs 3327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 vs 35.134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 vs 141.164 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 11181 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 542 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 3327 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | 35.134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | 141.164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Code name | AD106 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 7 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 75 | 556 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1557 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
| Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 4012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
IntelArc A750
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
