NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1620 MHz
3139.1x more texture fill rate: 244.1 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
6x more pipelines: 4608 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 759 vs 323
3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19586 vs 5918
5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109087 vs 20732
Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2701 vs 2340
4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 319.688 vs 75.758
7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.174 vs 5.071
8.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.946 vs 24.676
5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1585.54 vs 301.168

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2023 vs 1 February 2017
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz vs 1620 MHz
Texture fill rate	244.1 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4608 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 16 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	759 vs 323
PassMark - G3D Mark	19586 vs 5918
Geekbench - OpenCL	109087 vs 20732
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2701 vs 2340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	319.688 vs 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	36.174 vs 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	218.946 vs 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1585.54 vs 301.168

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
3.5x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective

Core clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 115 Watt
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

759

323

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

19586

5918

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

109087

20732

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2701

2340

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

319.688

75.758

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

36.174

5.071

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

218.946

24.676

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1585.54

301.168

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
PassMark - G2D Mark	759	323
PassMark - G3D Mark	19586	5918
Geekbench - OpenCL	109087	20732
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2701	2340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	319.688	75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	36.174	5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	218.946	24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1585.54	301.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		843.503
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3336

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Code name	AD106	GP106B
Launch date	2023	1 February 2017
Place in performance rating	80	533
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	1620 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1493 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	244.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.62 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	15.62 TFLOPS
Pipelines	4608	768
Pixel fill rate	81.36 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	244.1 GTexel/s	77.76 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt	75 Watt
Floating-point performance		2,488 gflops
Transistor count		4,400 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	112.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection