NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Intel UHD Graphics 770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Intel UHD Graphics 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 7.7x more core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1450 MHz
- 27x more texture fill rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 23.20 GTexel/s
- 30x more pipelines: 7680 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 10 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1198 vs 532
- 16.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31655 vs 1908
- 69.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5024 vs 72
- 26.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205069 vs 7628
- 20.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 46.442
- 23.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 67.426 vs 2.846
- 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 40.941
- 30.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2895.895 vs 94.384
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 4 Nov 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 1450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s vs 23.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 7680 vs 256 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 10 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 vs 532 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 vs 1908 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 vs 72 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 vs 7628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 vs 46.442 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 vs 2.846 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 vs 40.941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 vs 94.384 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770
- 19x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 285 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 285 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 770
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 | 532 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 | 1908 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 | 72 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 | 7628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 | 46.442 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 | 2.846 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 | 40.941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 | 94.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.2 |
| Code name | AD104 | Alder Lake GT1 |
| Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 4 Nov 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 8 | 832 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 626.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS | 742.4 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 7680 | 256 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.8 GPixel/s | 11.60 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s | 23.20 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | |
| Compute units | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7900
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080
