NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 2.3x more core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1005 MHz
  • Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1545 MHz
  • 2.2x more texture fill rate: 480.2 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
  • 2.6x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2304
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 168049 vs 85209
  • 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3854 vs 1873
  • Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 417.133 vs 232.933
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 55.476 vs 24.872
  • Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 245.639 vs 136.223
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2459.317 vs 1011.233
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2023 vs 13 November 2018
Core clock speed 2310 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Boost clock speed 2610 MHz vs 1545 MHz
Texture fill rate 480.2 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
Pipelines 5888 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 168049 vs 85209
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3854 vs 1873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 417.133 vs 232.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 55.476 vs 24.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 245.639 vs 136.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2459.317 vs 1011.233

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

  • Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 285 Watt
  • Around 24% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 160 Watt vs 285 Watt
Memory clock speed 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
168049
85209
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3854
1873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
417.133
232.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
55.476
24.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
245.639
136.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2459.317
1011.233
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
PassMark - G2D Mark 1166
PassMark - G3D Mark 26959
Geekbench - OpenCL 168049 85209
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3854 1873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 417.133 232.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 55.476 24.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 245.639 136.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2459.317 1011.233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3728.135
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace Turing
Code name AD104 TU104
Launch date 2023 13 November 2018
Place in performance rating 35 211
GCN generation Quadro RTX
Launch price (MSRP) $899
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2610 MHz 1545 MHz
Core clock speed 2310 MHz 1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 480.2 GFLOPS (1:64) 222.5 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 30.74 TFLOPS (1:1) 14.24 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 30.74 TFLOPS 7.119 TFLOPS
Pipelines 5888 2304
Pixel fill rate 167.0 GPixel/s 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 480.2 GTexel/s 222.5 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 285 Watt 160 Watt
Transistor count 35800 million 13600 million
Render output units 64
Texture Units 144

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Height 61 mm, 2.4 inches
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 336 mm, 13.2 inches 9.5 inches (241 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 12-pin 1x 8-pin
Width 140 mm, 5.5 inches

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.1
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 504.2 GB/s 416.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR6