NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs AMD FirePro S4000X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 and AMD FirePro S4000X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 2205 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 3.2x more boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 24564.5x more texture fill rate: 761.5 GTexel/s vs 31 GTexel / s
- 15.2x more pipelines: 9728 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- 37.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 722.769 vs 19.089
- 35x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 72.795 vs 2.08
- 7.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 272.641 vs 34.934
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 vs 7 August 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 2205 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 761.5 GTexel/s vs 31 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 9728 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 722.769 vs 19.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 72.795 vs 2.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 272.641 vs 34.934 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S4000X
- 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 320 Watt
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 320 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S4000X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | AMD FirePro S4000X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1236 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 34500 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6567 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 240557 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 722.769 | 19.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 72.795 | 2.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 272.641 | 34.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | AMD FirePro S4000X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | AD103 | Venus |
| Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 7 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 14 | 1420 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2205 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 761.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 48.74 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 9728 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 280.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 761.5 GTexel/s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45900 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | MXM-A |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 310 mm, 12.2 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | |
| Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 716.8 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |