NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- 488x more texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 1,056 GTexel/s
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 51% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1325 MHz, 21.2 Gbps effective
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 1,056 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1325 MHz, 21.2 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 2100 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 14080 vs 9728
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 20 GB vs 16 GB
Core clock speed | 2100 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Pipelines | 14080 vs 9728 |
Maximum memory size | 20 GB vs 16 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD103 | AD102 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 39 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 2100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1,056 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 67.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS | 67.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 9728 | 14080 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 345.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 1,056 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 400 Watt |
Transistor count | 45900 million | 76300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Triple-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
Length | 336 mm, 13.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 20 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 848.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1325 MHz, 21.2 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |