NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4.9x more core clock speed: 2235 MHz vs 459 MHz
- 358.3x more texture fill rate: 1,290 GTexel/s vs 3.6 billion / sec
- 1024x more pipelines: 16384 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 80 nm
- 96x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz
- 54x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1297 vs 24
- 245.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38287 vs 156
- 177.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317791 vs 1791
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 2235 MHz vs 459 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 1,290 GTexel/s vs 3.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 16384 vs 16 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1297 vs 24 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 38287 vs 156 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 317791 vs 1791 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 450 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 450 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1297 | 24 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 38287 | 156 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 582.642 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 98.472 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.756 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2968.159 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 317791 | 1791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 224 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 224 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 445 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 445 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Tesla |
| Code name | AD102 | G86 |
| Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 17 April 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 13 | 1695 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29.99 | |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.68 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2520 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 2235 MHz | 459 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 80 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,290 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 82.58 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 16384 | 16 |
| Pixel fill rate | 443.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 1,290 GTexel/s | 3.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 76300 million | 210 million |
| Floating-point performance | 29.376 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 304 mm, 12 inches | 170 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
| Width | 137 mm, 5.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 1,008 GB/s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | DDR2 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7800
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7900
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 vs
NVIDIARTX 4500 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 D
