NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 60% higher core clock speed: 2235 MHz vs 1395 MHz
  • Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 2520 MHz vs 1695 MHz
  • Around 56% higher pipelines: 16384 vs 10496
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
  • Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1297 vs 1060
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38287 vs 26668
  • Around 80% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9223 vs 5118
  • Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 98.472 vs 62.614
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2968.159 vs 2441.384
  • Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317791 vs 191142
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 Sep 2022 vs 1 Sep 2020
Core clock speed 2235 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Boost clock speed 2520 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Pipelines 16384 vs 10496
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 8 nm
Memory clock speed 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 1297 vs 1060
PassMark - G3D Mark 38287 vs 26668
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 9223 vs 5118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 98.472 vs 62.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2968.159 vs 2441.384
Geekbench - OpenCL 317791 vs 191142

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

  • 431x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s
  • Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 450 Watt
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 582.642
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 178.756
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 556.0 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 350 Watt vs 450 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 690.619 vs 582.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 209.424 vs 178.756

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1297
1060
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
38287
26668
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
9223
5118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
582.642
690.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
98.472
62.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
178.756
209.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2968.159
2441.384
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
317791
191142
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark 1297 1060
PassMark - G3D Mark 38287 26668
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 9223 5118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 582.642 690.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 98.472 62.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 178.756 209.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2968.159 2441.384
Geekbench - OpenCL 317791 191142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 0 7585.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace Ampere
Code name AD102 GA102
Launch date 20 Sep 2022 1 Sep 2020
Place in performance rating 13 46
Launch price (MSRP) $1499
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2520 MHz 1695 MHz
Core clock speed 2235 MHz 1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 1,290 GFLOPS (1:64) 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1) 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 82.58 TFLOPS 35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines 16384 10496
Pixel fill rate 443.5 GPixel/s 189.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 1,290 GTexel/s 556.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 450 Watt 350 Watt
Transistor count 76300 million 28300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Triple-slot
Height 61 mm, 2.4 inches 138 mm (5.4 inches)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 304 mm, 12 inches 313 mm (12.3 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt 750 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 16-pin 1x 12-pin
Width 137 mm, 5.4 inches Triple-slot

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.2
OpenCL 3.0 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 1,008 GB/s 936.2 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 bit 384 bit
Memory clock speed 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR6X