NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

2.1x more pipelines: 16384 vs 7680
2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1305 vs 1197
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38706 vs 31771
Around 60% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 36543 vs 22811
Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 95.851 vs 67.426
Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4429.59 vs 2895.895
Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 320210 vs 206419

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	16384 vs 7680
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 12 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1305 vs 1197
PassMark - G3D Mark	38706 vs 31771
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	36543 vs 22811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	95.851 vs 67.426
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4429.59 vs 2895.895
Geekbench - OpenCL	320210 vs 206419

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 2235 MHz
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 2520 MHz
485.6x more texture fill rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s
Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 285 Watt vs 450 Watt
Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 472.899
Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 221.169

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 Jan 2023 vs 20 Sep 2022
Core clock speed	2310 MHz vs 2235 MHz
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz vs 2520 MHz
Texture fill rate	626.4 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	285 Watt vs 450 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	939.363 vs 472.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	348.259 vs 221.169

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1305

1197

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

38706

31771

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

36543

22811

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

472.899

939.363

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

95.851

67.426

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

221.169

348.259

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4429.59

2895.895

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

320210

206419

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	1305	1197
PassMark - G3D Mark	38706	31771
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	36543	22811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	472.899	939.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	95.851	67.426
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	221.169	348.259
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4429.59	2895.895
Geekbench - OpenCL	320210	206419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Code name	AD102	AD104
Launch date	20 Sep 2022	3 Jan 2023
Place in performance rating	8	10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2520 MHz	2610 MHz
Core clock speed	2235 MHz	2310 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	4 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,290 GFLOPS (1:64)	626.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	82.58 TFLOPS (1:1)	40.09 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	82.58 TFLOPS	40.09 TFLOPS
Pipelines	16384	7680
Pixel fill rate	443.5 GPixel/s	208.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	1,290 GTexel/s	626.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	450 Watt	285 Watt
Transistor count	76300 million	35800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Triple-slot	Dual-slot
Height	61 mm, 2.4 inches	42 mm, 1.7 inches
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	304 mm, 12 inches	285 mm, 11.2 inches
Recommended system power (PSU)	850 Watt	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 16-pin
Width	137 mm, 5.4 inches	112 mm, 4.4 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	1,008 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Memory bus width	384 bit	192 bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6X