NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 10 month(s) later
4.7x more core clock speed: 2235 MHz vs 475 MHz
84.9x more texture fill rate: 1,290 GTexel/s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
64x more pipelines: 16384 vs 256
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 40 nm
12x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 2 GB
3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1297 vs 382
25.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38287 vs 1476
43.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 582.642 vs 13.345
63.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 98.472 vs 1.552
8.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.756 vs 20.453
74.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2968.159 vs 39.651
63.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317791 vs 5013

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	20 Sep 2022 vs 2 November 2010
Core clock speed	2235 MHz vs 475 MHz
Texture fill rate	1,290 GTexel/s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	16384 vs 256
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1297 vs 382
PassMark - G3D Mark	38287 vs 1476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	582.642 vs 13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	98.472 vs 1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	178.756 vs 20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2968.159 vs 39.651
Geekbench - OpenCL	317791 vs 5013

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000

3.2x lower typical power consumption: 142 Watt vs 450 Watt
2.1x more memory clock speed: 2808 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	142 Watt vs 450 Watt
Memory clock speed	2808 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1297

382

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

38287

1476

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

582.642

13.345

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

98.472

1.552

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

178.756

20.453

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2968.159

39.651

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

317791

5013

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	NVIDIA Quadro 4000
PassMark - G2D Mark	1297	382
PassMark - G3D Mark	38287	1476
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	9223	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	582.642	13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	98.472	1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	178.756	20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2968.159	39.651
Geekbench - OpenCL	317791	5013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	0	306.122
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3350

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Fermi
Code name	AD102	GF100
Launch date	20 Sep 2022	2 November 2010
Place in performance rating	13	1047
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,199
Price now		$141.66
Type		Workstation
Value for money (0-100)		17.08
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2520 MHz
Core clock speed	2235 MHz	475 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,290 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	82.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	82.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines	16384	256
Pixel fill rate	443.5 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	1,290 GTexel/s	15.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	450 Watt	142 Watt
Transistor count	76300 million	3,100 million
Floating-point performance		486.4 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Triple-slot
Height	61 mm, 2.4 inches
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	304 mm, 12 inches	241 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 6-pin
Width	137 mm, 5.4 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	1,008 GB/s	89.9 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective	2808 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR5