NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1770 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 976 vs 785
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 28791 vs 18544
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317204 vs 74179

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 915 MHz
• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 5.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 785
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	28791 18544
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	317204 74179

Compare specifications (specs)