NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 230 Watt
Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1110 vs 783
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13707 vs 13225
Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72767 vs 69537
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.704 vs 171.616
Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.913 vs 16.925

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 Nov 2021 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	70 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1110 vs 783
PassMark - G3D Mark	13707 vs 13225
Geekbench - OpenCL	72767 vs 69537
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	207.704 vs 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	22.913 vs 16.925

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

2.1x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 3385.355
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 240.964
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1195.863 vs 1030.098

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1530 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4031.404 vs 3385.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	247.788 vs 240.964
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1195.863 vs 1030.098

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1110

783

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13707

13225

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

72767

69537

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

207.704

171.616

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3385.355

4031.404

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

22.913

16.925

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

240.964

247.788

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1030.098

1195.863

Name	NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark	1110	783
PassMark - G3D Mark	13707	13225
Geekbench - OpenCL	72767	69537
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5815
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	207.704	171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3385.355	4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	22.913	16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	240.964	247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1030.098	1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		30936

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 5.0
Code name	GA106	Vega 10
Launch date	23 Nov 2021	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	124	122
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$999
Type		Workstation
Value for money (0-100)		13.37
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1530 MHz
Core clock speed	562 MHz	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3328
Pixel fill rate	57.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	124.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	70 Watt	230 Watt
Transistor count	12000 million	12,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a	4x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	167 mm, 6.6 inches	267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	250 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	69 mm, 2.7 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective	2000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6