NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher pipelines: 3328 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1108 vs 920
- 2907.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5815 vs 2
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 240.964 vs 190.349
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 23 July 2019 |
| Pipelines | 3328 vs 3072 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1108 vs 920 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 vs 2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 vs 190.349 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19538 vs 13714
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 115519 vs 72802
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 338.122 vs 207.704
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4571.03 vs 3385.355
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.6 vs 22.913
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1653.08 vs 1030.098
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19538 vs 13714 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 115519 vs 72802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 vs 207.704 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 vs 3385.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 vs 22.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 vs 1030.098 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1108 | 920 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13714 | 19538 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72802 | 115519 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 | 2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 | 338.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 | 4571.03 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 | 31.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 | 190.349 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 | 1653.08 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA106 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 23 July 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 111 | 108 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Length | 167 mm, 6.6 inches | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 650 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | 2-Slot |
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
