NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 285 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
- Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5815 vs 5024
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 285 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 vs 5024 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 7680 vs 3328
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1198 vs 1110
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31655 vs 13725
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205069 vs 72896
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 207.704
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 67.426 vs 22.913
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 240.964
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2895.895 vs 1030.098
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 23 Nov 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 7680 vs 3328 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 vs 1110 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 vs 13725 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 vs 72896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 vs 207.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 vs 22.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 vs 240.964 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 vs 1030.098 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1110 | 1198 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13725 | 31655 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72896 | 205069 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 | 5024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 | 939.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 | 67.426 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 | 348.259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 | 2895.895 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | GA106 | AD104 |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 3 Jan 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 114 | 8 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 2610 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 2310 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 626.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3328 | 7680 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | 208.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 626.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 285 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 35800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 167 mm, 6.6 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 504.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |