NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- 4.3x more pipelines: 3328 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1110 vs 404
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13725 vs 6494
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72896 vs 32981
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.704 vs 87.83
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3328 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1110 vs 404 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13725 vs 6494 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72896 vs 32981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 vs 87.83 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 70 Watt
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 70 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1110 | 404 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13725 | 6494 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72896 | 32981 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 | 87.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA106 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 114 | 400 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 69.84 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.470 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 167 mm, 6.6 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |

