NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 369.6 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 7168 vs 5888
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 20 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1058 vs 996
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 142308 vs 123347
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 7168 vs 5888 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 20 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1058 vs 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 142308 vs 123347 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22331 vs 21559
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13659 vs 12768
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22331 vs 21559 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13659 vs 12768 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1058 | 996 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21559 | 22331 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 142308 | 123347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12768 | 13659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA102 | GA104 |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 42 | 45 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 739.2 GFLOPS (1:32) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 7168 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 640.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |