NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500
- 286.5x more texture fill rate: 369.6 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 450 Watt
- Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
| Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s vs 1,290 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 450 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 2235 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 2520 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- 2.3x more pipelines: 16384 vs 7168
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 20 GB
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1297 vs 1051
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 38287 vs 21280
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 317791 vs 142326
- 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9223 vs 3196
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 vs 23 Nov 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 2235 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2520 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
| Pipelines | 16384 vs 7168 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 20 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1297 vs 1051 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 38287 vs 21280 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 317791 vs 142326 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9223 vs 3196 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 1297 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21280 | 38287 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 142326 | 317791 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3196 | 9223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 582.642 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 98.472 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.756 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2968.159 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | GA102 | AD102 |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 20 Sep 2022 |
| Place in performance rating | 55 | 13 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 2235 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 739.2 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1,290 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 7168 | 16384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | 443.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s | 1,290 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 76300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Triple-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 304 mm, 12 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 850 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 137 mm, 5.4 inches |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 640.0 GB/s | 1,008 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 320 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
