NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4500 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 706 MHz
- 4089.9x more texture fill rate: 369.6 GTexel/s vs 90.37 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 7168 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x more maximum memory size: 20 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 25 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s vs 90.37 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 7168 vs 1536 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 20 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21280 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 142326 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3196 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Code name | GA102 | GK104 |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 25 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 55 | not rated |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,299 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 739.2 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 7168 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,169 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 640.0 GB/s | 172.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |