NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80

  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel/s
  • Around 95% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 1280
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5852 vs 4643
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 171.4 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2496 vs 1280
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5852 vs 4643

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 66% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 562 MHz
  • Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1011 MHz vs 824 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 405 vs 374
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 February 2018 vs 17 Nov 2014
Core clock speed 931 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed 1011 MHz vs 824 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 405 vs 374

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
374
405
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5852
4643
Name NVIDIA Tesla K80 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
PassMark - G2D Mark 374 405
PassMark - G3D Mark 5852 4643

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla K80 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 GCN 4.0
Code name GK210 Polaris 22
Launch date 17 Nov 2014 1 February 2018
Place in performance rating 256 258
Type Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 824 MHz 1011 MHz
Core clock speed 562 MHz 931 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) 161.8 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.113 TFLOPS 2.588 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2496 1280
Pixel fill rate 42.85 GPixel/s 32.35 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 171.4 GTexel/s 80.88 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt
Transistor count 7100 million 5000 million
Compute performance 20
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.588 TFLOPS
Texture Units 65 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 IGP
Length 267 mm, 10.5 inches
Recommended system power (PSU) 700 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
OpenCL 3.0 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 (5.1) 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 240.6 GB/s 179.2 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 bit 1024 bit
Memory clock speed 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR5 HBM2
High bandwidth memory (HBM)

Technologies

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)