NVIDIA NVS 5100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 116.16 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 200 vs 122
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2747 vs 2058
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2747 vs 2058
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 15 June 2009 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 116.16 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 200 vs 122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2747 vs 2058 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2747 vs 2058 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 74 vs 62
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 74 vs 62 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 200 | 122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 62 | 74 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6549 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2747 | 2058 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2747 | 2058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT216 | G96C |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1490 | 1491 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 116.16 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-II |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |