NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs Intel HD Graphics P3000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and Intel HD Graphics P3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 514 vs 287
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 82
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 vs 1300
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 vs 1300

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P3000

• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 672 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P3000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	514 287
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	188 82
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 1300
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 1300

Compare specifications (specs)