NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs AMD Radeon E6460

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and AMD Radeon E6460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 10.75 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
• Around 34% better floating-point performance: 258.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 513 vs 324
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 1.616
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 104.843
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 vs 0.225
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 vs 4.942
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1099 vs 801
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 vs 1925
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1099 vs 801
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 vs 1925

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6460

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
• Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 3140 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 188
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.457 vs 16.851
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 531 vs 222
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 531 vs 222

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6460

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	513 324
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	188 225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.829 1.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.966 104.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.539 0.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.643 4.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.851 18.457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222 531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 1925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222 531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 1925

Compare specifications (specs)