NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs AMD Radeon E6460
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and AMD Radeon E6460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 10.75 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 258.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 511 vs 324
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 1.616
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 104.843
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 vs 0.225
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 vs 4.942
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1099 vs 801
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 vs 1925
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1099 vs 801
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 vs 1925
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 September 2012 vs 7 April 2011 |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10.75 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 258.0 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 511 vs 324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.829 vs 1.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 189.966 vs 104.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.539 vs 0.225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.643 vs 4.942 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1099 vs 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2715 vs 1925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1099 vs 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2715 vs 1925 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6460
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 3140 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 188
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.457 vs 16.851
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 531 vs 222
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 531 vs 222
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 160 vs 96 |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 3140 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.457 vs 16.851 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 531 vs 222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 531 vs 222 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 5200M | AMD Radeon E6460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 511 | 324 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.829 | 1.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 189.966 | 104.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.539 | 0.225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.643 | 4.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.851 | 18.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 222 | 531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1099 | 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2715 | 1925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 222 | 531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1099 | 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2715 | 1925 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 5200M | AMD Radeon E6460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Caicos |
Launch date | 17 September 2012 | 7 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1513 | 1516 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 672 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 258.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 10.75 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.12 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3140 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |