NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs AMD Radeon E6460

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and AMD Radeon E6460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 2.2x more texture fill rate: 10.75 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 34% better floating-point performance: 258.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 513 vs 324
  • 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 1.616
  • Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 104.843
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 vs 0.225
  • Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 vs 4.942
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1099 vs 801
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 vs 1925
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1099 vs 801
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 vs 1925
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 September 2012 vs 7 April 2011
Core clock speed 672 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 10.75 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 258.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 513 vs 324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.829 vs 1.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 189.966 vs 104.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.539 vs 0.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.643 vs 4.942
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1099 vs 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2715 vs 1925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1099 vs 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2715 vs 1925

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6460

  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
  • Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 3140 MHz
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 189
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.457 vs 16.851
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 531 vs 222
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 531 vs 222
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 160 vs 96
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz vs 3140 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 225 vs 189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 18.457 vs 16.851
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 531 vs 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 531 vs 222

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6460

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
513
324
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
189
225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.829
1.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
189.966
104.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.539
0.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9.643
4.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16.851
18.457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
222
531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1099
801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2715
1925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
222
531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1099
801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2715
1925
Name NVIDIA NVS 5200M AMD Radeon E6460
PassMark - G3D Mark 513 324
PassMark - G2D Mark 189 225
Geekbench - OpenCL 2197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.829 1.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 189.966 104.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.539 0.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.643 4.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.851 18.457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 222 531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1099 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2715 1925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 222 531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1099 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2715 1925

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA NVS 5200M AMD Radeon E6460

Essentials

Architecture Fermi TeraScale 2
Code name GF108 Caicos
Launch date 17 September 2012 7 April 2011
Place in performance rating 1515 1517
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 672 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 258.0 gflops 192 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 160
Texture fill rate 10.75 GTexel / s 4.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 25 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 370 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 25.12 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 3140 MHz 3200 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0