NVIDIA P102-100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P102-100 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P102-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 73.2x more texture fill rate: 316.4 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 400x more pipelines: 3200 vs 8
- 585.9x better floating-point performance: 10,125 gflops vs 17.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 65 nm
- 20x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 256 MB
- 10x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 12 February 2018 vs 6 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.4 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3200 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops vs 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P102-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Name | NVIDIA P102-100 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64572 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 108 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P102-100 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
Code name | GP102 | G98 |
Launch date | 12 February 2018 | 6 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 324 | 316 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops | 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 3200 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 316.4 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 400.3 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | DDR2 |