NVIDIA P104-100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P104-100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P104-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 102.5 billion / sec
- Around 90% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1344
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 1668x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51497 vs 15494
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 vs 10 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 102.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 vs 15494 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 120
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5326 vs 3628
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 120 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5326 vs 3628 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P104-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P104-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 | 15494 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 532 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3628 | 5326 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P104-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP104 | GK104 |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 | 10 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 566 | 568 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $474.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |