NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 834 MHz
• Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
• Around 46% better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 2,989 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5460 MHz
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6357 vs 5024
• Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34722 vs 23587
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 56.272
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 778.867
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 5.051
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 vs 65.535
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 336.811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

• Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 745 vs 255

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6357 5024
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	255 745
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	34722 23587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 5.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 65.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 336.811

Compare specifications (specs)