NVIDIA P106-100 vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and NVIDIA Tesla M40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 948 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
| Launch date | 19 June 2017 vs 10 November 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 948 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 213.9 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1280
- Around 56% better floating-point performance: 6,844 gflops vs 4,375 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10220 vs 6724
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 437 vs 251
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39184 vs 36174
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 183.81 vs 163.993
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 vs 1705.321
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.059 vs 9.266
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 76.32
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 688.388 vs 448.036
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1280 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops vs 4,375 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10220 vs 6724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 vs 251 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39184 vs 36174 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 vs 163.993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 vs 1705.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 vs 9.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 vs 76.32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 vs 448.036 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M40
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA P106-100 | NVIDIA Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6724 | 10220 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 251 | 437 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36174 | 39184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 | 183.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 | 2637.997 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 | 13.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 | 160.359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 | 688.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1860 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1860 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 899 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA P106-100 | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP106 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 19 June 2017 | 10 November 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 439 | 260 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 948 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 3072 |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 288.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
